Tuesday, 29 December 2020

How One Night @ Call Center Shaped Me ?

* What is Literature ?

Literature represents the Culture and tradition of a language or a people. the concept is difficult to precisely define, thought many have tried; it's clear that the accepted definition of literature is constantly changing and evolving. the words literature suggests a higher art form; merely putting words on a page doesn't necessarily equate to creating literature. A canon is the accepted body of works of literature are considered canonical, that is, culturally representative of a particular genre (poetry, prose, or drama). literature fiction from so-called "genre fiction", which includes types such as mystery, science fiction, western, romance, thriller and horror.

* How ON@TCC Shaped me ?

  Literature is not just imaginative stories written in leisure time only for entertainment. literature is mirror or photographic image of society. I read Chetan Bhagat's best selling novel "One Night @ Call Center" Now let me tell you little about this particular novel, it helps me in becoming better me. First time read in Chetan Bhagat novel One Night @ Call Center. this novel is a very interesting. Chetan Bhagat is a hardworking man. Chetan Bhagat all novel are very interesting and knowledgeable.

This novel in a six characters. this novel also throws light on the contemporary issues of present society. All six character have their own problems in their personal life. call center is a place which unites all the six characters. six character are employees in call center. Shyam Mehra call name Sam Marcy he is the narrator of the story. Shyam his Priyanka with whom he has had a break up. he is a person self confidence. he is extremely talented. Priyanka is a heroine of the novel. Priyanka is an intelligent and practical girl. she loves Shyam. Priyanka is initially happy about her new engagement with Ganesh Gupta. Esha is an attractive girl. she went to cross the limits of sleeping with the designer to get the contract.

Radhika Jha is already married. she has great truth and love for her husband. Radhika husband affair with another girl. Radhika not happy in your marriage life. Varun Malhotra call name victor mell is Shyam's friend. Vroom is the one who saves "Connextions" call center from a major problem using his skills. Military uncle is a old man. who live alone and having some problem with his son and grandson but at the end he realizes his mistake and decide to apologize.

This novel end all character phone in receiving a call from god their deserted life changes in the greeny one. all character is very problems in your life. all character facing all problems. then god call in all character phone. end in a all character life are a very change. Now, all man life in facing the problems. All of us are facing problem in one or another way in life. the thing i learn from this is that never doubt on your personality. in this novel it is understood that calamity must be dealt with.

             Thank you

literature

Friday, 4 December 2020

online workshop Technolgy integration for semg

Learning system is developing fast. The learning process has become easier than before. Technology has taken the place of an immensely important tool of the learning system. E-mails, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Imo, Line App and WhatsApp are some of the most important, common, social, immediate messaging tools. WhatsApp is generally used on the m...

Saturday, 28 November 2020

Thinking Activities: The Birthday party

The Birthday Party (1957) is the second full-length play by Harold Pinter, first published in London by Encore Publishing in 1959. It is one of his best-known and most frequently performed plays. In the setting of a rundown seaside boarding house, a little birthday party is turned into a nightmare when two sinister strangers arrive unexpectedly. The play has been classified as a comedy of menace, characterized by Pinteresque elements such as ambiguous identity, confusions of time and place, and dark political symbolism.

Why are two scenes of Lulu omitted from the movie?

      
It is very difficult to know director’s intention behind omitting Lulu’s scene because it does not make any difference if the scenes are omitted. Lulu is a girl who can be impressed very easily and we can see in the movie that she is actively participating with Goldberg. Goldberg is not doing it forcefully or Lulu is not in position where she has to be submissive, she is doing it willingly. The center of the play is Stanley and symbolically Lulu is his inspiration. When Lulu goes near to Goldberg, it is enough to see that how Stanley is left alone now and after this may be there is no need to show the scene of Lulu blaming Goldberg. May be because of this reason director omitted the scene of Lulu.

Is movie successful in giving us the effect of menace? Where you able to feel it while reading the text?


Comedy of menace is the body of plays written by David Campton, Nigel Dennis, N. F. Simpson, and Harold Pinter. The term was coined by drama critic Irving Wardle, who borrowed it from the subtitle of Campton's play The Lunatic View: A Comedy of Menace, in reviewing Pinter's and Campton's plays in Encore in 1958. (Campton's subtitle Comedy of Menace is a jocular play-on-words derived from comedy of mannersmenace being manners pronounced with somewhat of a Judeo-English accent.

while watching the movie I feel the effect of Manace. the pause and silence of printer is hard to understand while we reading.

Do you feel the effect of lurking danger while viewing the movie? Where you able to feel the same while reading the  text. 
       
      Yes, I do feel lurking danger while watching movie. In movie I feel it when Stanley hide in kitchen and Then again when interrogation scene came and at last when they take Stanley away.

What do you read in 'newspaper' in the movie? Petey is reading newspaper to Meg, it torn into pieces by McCain, pieces are hidden by Petey in last scene.
  
    - Obstacle in communication. 

   - Petey is reading in the beginning .we can read that behind newspaper he is hiding his impotency. 

      - Later on this newspaper was torn into pieces by Maccan,which represent that Maccan himself is broken inside like these torn pieces of newspaper

Camera is positioned over the head of McCain when he is playing Blind Man's Buff and is positioned at the top with a view of room like a cage (trap) when Stanley is playing it. What interpretations can you give to these positioning of camera?      
    
    The director of the movie had taken very effective work from camera. During the blind man’s buff scene also it works effectively. MacCann was there in that house because he wants to grab Stanley. When it come to blindfold MacCann the camera was over the head of MacCann and his expression was also savage. It is like he is trying to get his prey. But when it comes to Stanley the camera is on top of the room and room is looking like cage and Stanley is trying to escape. So it is symbolically said that now Stanley is in trap and he can not escape because Goldberg and MacCann will not allow him to do so.

"Pinter restored theater to its basic elements: an enclosed space and unpredictable dialogue, where people are at the mercy of one another and pretense crumbles." (Pinter, Art, Truth & Politics: Excerpts from the 2005 Nobel Lecture). Does this happen in the movie?
      
     Yes, this do happen in movie. Most of the scenes are in drawing room. The space is so narrow and the dialogues are also impulsive. We cannot imagine what is going on in the mind of characters. Every character is on the mercy of each other,Every characters are living on other. At some point of time every one’s false faces falls down. They became what they really are. So yes these lines do happen How does viewing movie help in better understanding of the play ‘The Birthday Party’ with its typical characteristics (like painteresque, pause, silence, menace, lurking danger)?

 Yes, it is better to watch movie of this play then the reading and it also gives deeper understanding of Pinter’s characteristics and characters. there is two Silence in Pinter’s play which gave better understanding rather than reading. The pause we can feel while watching but while reading it is just like a word.

I    With which of the following observations you agree:
o   “It probably wasn't possible to make a satisfactory film of "The Birthday Party."
o    “It's impossible to imagine a better film of Pinter's play than this sensitive, disturbing version directed by William Friedkin. (Ebert)

In this movie we feel all the effect which Pinter wants to create on audience mind. Director has take good shots from camera and all actors have also did very good job. So I can’t imagine a better film than this one.so, here i will go with second point.

sort of difference would you make in the making of movie?
·   Who would be your choice of actors to play the role of characters?

If I have to choose the actors for this movie I will choose…

Stanley – Ranveer Singh
Goldberg – Pankaj Tripathi
MacCann – Manoj bajpayee
Petey – Anupam Kher
Meg – Kiran Kher
Lulu – Kaira advani




Friday, 27 November 2020

Thinking Activities : The Birthday party

 

Thinking activity according to this link


https://blog.dilipbarad.com/2013/09/worksheet-film-screening-harold-pinters.html?m=1



The Birthday party” play is written by Harold Pinter. Harold Pinter was English playwright, known for his so-called Comedies of Menace. In the 2005 he was awarded the Nobel prize in literature. The Birthday Party is a 1968 film directed by William Friedkin, and starring Robert Shaw,based on the 1957 play The Birthday Party by Harold Pinter.


1) Why are two scenes of Lulu omitted from the movie?

Lulu’s two scenes can’t omitted from the movie may be Director shown only good thing, and in the movie Lulu's character portrait as differ from novel. And may be he didn’t want to focus on female characters in the movie otherwise he was less focus on female characters  justification like Meg and Lulu because this character show only few minutes and Meg and Lulu haven’t individuals identity. In the film we can see Meg most of in the kitchen and Lulu show ready for sexual relationship.


     2)   Is movie successful in giving us the effect of menace? Where you able to feel it while reading the text?

No, movie isn’t successful in giving us the effect of menace. Where I able to feel it while reading the text. Because dialogue of this movie it is like quick that much quick dialogue through we can not feel menace. While reading text during I feel effect of menace.

3) Do you feel the effect of lurking danger while viewing the movie? Where you able to feel the same while reading the text.

Yes, I felt the effect of lurking danger while viewing the movie. When Stanley constantly biting the drum and during light off after Lulu's screaming voice there scenes are effect of lurking danger while viewing the movie. Petey read newspaper and Meg asking questions there I felt the same to watching movie and reading text.

4) What do you read in 'newspaper' in the movie? Petey is reading newspaper to Meg, it torn into pieces by McCain, pieces are hidden by Petey in last scene.

In the movie newspaper is most important thing because constantly shown newspaper scene it direct to people know everything but avoid to accept fact. Here in the play Petey reading newspaper and her wife ask about news and she is not interested to knowing thing but her purpose to satire on her husband. Petey know about her wife ambiguity relation with Stendly but he avoided and reading newspaper. McCain cutting newspaper and that pieces are hidden by Petey in last scene it may be suggest that how news reality missing and unfold by someone.

5) Camera is positioned over the head of McCain when he is playing Blind Man's Buff and is positioned at the top with a view of room like a cage (trap) when Stanley is playing it. What interpretations can you give to these positioning of camera? 

Camera is positioned over the head of McCain when he is playing Blind Man's Buff it suggest that McCain who don’t able to show reality of Goldberg that why he blindly follow Goldberg. When Stanley was playing game at that time camara positioned at the top with a view of room like a cage, this is given sign of Standly position like he is in cage or trap by system.

6) "Pinter restored theater to its basic elements: an enclosed space and unpredictable dialogue, where people are at the mercy of one another and pretense crumbles." (Pinter, Art, Truth & Politics: Excerpts from the 2005 Nobel Lecture). Does this happen in the movie?

Yes, I felt mercy to watching movie and as well to reading text. And also seen in the movie and text unpredictable dialogue, where like when Goldberg asking questions to Standly their dialogue like to hidden something it doesn’t shown in the movie and text.
GOLDBERG -Where was your wife?
STANLEY - In-
GOLDBERG - Answer.
STANLEY-  [turning, crouched.] What wife?
GOLDBERG- What have you done with your wife?

STANLEY - In-
GOLDBERG - Answer.
STANLEY-  [turning, crouched.] What wife?
GOLDBERG- What have you done with your wife?

Other dialogue-

GOLDBERG-  Do you recognise an external force, responsible for
you, suffering for you?
STANLEY- It's late.

7)  How does viewing movie help in better understanding of the play ‘The Birthday Party’ with its typical characteristics (like painteresque, pause, silence, menace, lurking danger)?

Really Movie help for better understanding of the play 'The Birthday party'. In the movie I can well understand tone like silence, pause , menace. But in the movie I can’t seen Painteresque characteristics while reading a play at that time I was seeing Painteresque characteristics.

8) With which of the following observations you agree:
o   “It probably wasn't possible to make a satisfactory film of "The Birthday Party."
o    “It's impossible to imagine a better film of Pinter's play than this sensitive, disturbing version directed by William hiFriedkin”[3]. (Ebert)

I agree with second observation because director could make more attractive for audience because this movie is such boring according to me. Waiting for Godot is also absurd play and less even it is attractive when in this movie more characters even like boring for me. So director could make more interesting.

9) If you were director or screenplay writer, what sort of difference would you make in the making of movie?

If I was director for this movie I would try to make more interesting for audience that why audience don’t feel boring.

10) Who would be your choice of actors to play the role of characters?
I would be choice this actor to play the role of characters-
Stendly role for Ranveer 

Nargis choose for Lulu role

Helan choose for Meg role

Rishi Kapoor choose for Petey role

Ronit Roy choose for Goldberg role




Varun Sharma choose for McCain



11)  Do you see any similarities among Kafka's Joseph K. (in 'The Trial'), Orwell's Winston Smith (in 'Nineteen Eighty-Four') and Pinter's Victor (in 'One for the Road')?

Yes, I can see similarities among Kafka’s Joseph K. (The Trial) in this text also seen dedctive story as like Birthday party play, I can say it dedctive story of one person may be who against politics leader. And Orwell's Winston Smith in the ‘Nineteenth Eighty- Four' according to film version it is very strong and heartouchble movie.
Pinter’s play similarities to Kafka’s work because he read works of Kafka.

Monday, 23 November 2020

Thinking Activities on Waiting for Godot





Waiting for Godot play is written by Samuel Backett.
Tragic comic play
Absurd Theatre of the play
 Characters - Vladimir, Estrogen, Pozzo, Lucky, a little Boy (messages)

1)       What connection do you see in the setting (“A country road. A tree.Evening.”) of the play and these paintings?
They inspired Beckett for the 'Setting' of his play - 'Waiting for Godot'.The 'longing' may be 'waiting' but then there is no further comparison possible. The 'waiting' for Beckett is in the indifference and uncaring universe. It means doesn’t matter for universe, you are doing anything but nature doesn’t change. If we feel sadness so we say nothingness in life but universe never change according our emotions. This is fact of the universe longing and waiting are only human emotions not for universe.

2)       The tree is the only important ‘thing’ in the setting. What is the importance of tree in both acts? Why does Beckett grow a few leaves in Act II on the barren tree -The tree has four or five leaves -? 

Yes, we can say tree is the only important thing in the setting. In the first act tree shown as like barren and the second act tree shown as a few leaves may be that is sign of hopeless and second act a few leaves are there may be it is sign of rebirth of hope. Beckett shown same setting may be its through he shown nothingness in life like barren tree and sometimes a few (leaves)hope may be alive reason for human life.
3)   In both Acts, evening falls into night and moon rises. How would you like to interpret this ‘coming of night and moon’ when actually they are wwaiting for Godot?

In both Acts, evening falls into night and moon rises it is just like time passed. Human beings act like waste of time and waiting for death. If we are stay away our life in one place and constantly waiting for some thing so universe can’t change their routing.

4)     The director feels the setting with some debris. Can you read any meaning in the contours of debris in the setting of the play?

Yes, I can read various meaning in the contours of debris in the setting of the play. It is show world war after situation and when I try to connect with present time so it like strong philosophy of the life everything it becomes worst at the end of our body parts like stone and mixed with stone.

5)     The play begins with the dialogue “Nothing to be done”. How does the theme of ‘nothingness’ recurs in the play?

The play begins with the dialogue “Nothing to be done” this dialogue repeatedly come again Vladimir and Estrogen waiting for Godot but Nobody come there and they are wasting time throughout in the play. And I try to find other means Nothing to be done means whatever our age when we ask ourselves so ourselves answer may be same – Nothing to be done.

6)  Do you agree: “The play (Waiting for Godot), we agreed, was a positive play, not negative, not pessimistic. As I saw it, with my blood and skin and eyes, the philosophy is: 'No matter what— atom bombs, hydrogen bombs, anything—life goes on. You can kill yourself, but you can't kill life." (E.G. Marshal who played Vladimir in original Broadway production 1950s)?

Yes, I agree the play is positive play, not negative, not pessimistic because Vladimir hope didn’t broke for waiting Godot and universe never change for anyone it routine continue happens without difference but sometimes we killed ourselves for something even we can’t kill life. For example sometimes our hope or desire may be not fulfilled but we can’t kill our self and if we can able to have that much courage to killed our self so it like to run away from situation.

7)       How are the props like hat and boots used in the play? What is the symbolical significance of these props?

The props like hat and boots are symbol of trivial things of human life in this play Estrogen try to make free from feet boot but it is more tit for his feet and Act II his boot comfortable for his feet so it suggests how life unfit become one time suitable or habits.
Hat is also symbol of intellect person how their hat on other person hand as like Lucky's hat.

8) Do you think that the obedience of Lucky is extremely irritating and nauseatic? Even when the master Pozzo is blind, he obediently hands the whip in his hand. Do you think that such a capacity of slavishness is unbelievable?

One sence I think that the obedience of Lucky is extremely irritating and nauseatic because Lucky didn't want to think himself when Vladimir suggest him even he against him because his slave mindset. That why he couldn't want to think himself and follow his master voice even his master blind he didn't try to run way from his master chain.

Pozzo - Lucky: Master-Slave

9)   Who according to you is Godot? God? An object of desire? Death? Goal? Success? Or  . . .
According to me Godot is my presence to give best in my interesting field and others thing like desire and success automatically come after your footprint. And Death is reality of the every living object so why I wait for death it will be come in anytime and anyway so to be readiness for all.

10) “The subject of the play is not Godot but ‘Waiting’” (Esslin, A Search for the Self). Do you agree? How can you justify your answer?

Yes, I am agree the subject of the play is not Godot but ‘Waiting’ because here author more focused on waiting for example most of Estrogen forget and speak why are we here? Then Vladimir answer him we are waiting for Godot. This dialogue repeatedly show it sign they are waiting for Godot. Simply I say struggle is more important than success because without struggle it doesn’t become success here the same thing waiting is most important than Godot because Godot means may be searching self is not happen without experience(waiting).

11) Do you think that plays like this can better be ‘read’ than ‘viewed’ as it requires a lot of thinking on the part of readers, while viewing, the torrent of dialogues does not give ample time and space to ‘think’? Or is it that the audio-visuals help in better understanding of the play?

I think sometimes reading is helpful to be active visual various image in our mind while viewing play during we can understand various tone and contest of dialogue how some of repeatedly sentences speak as differences level and we can understand better than reading. Like one dialogue speak by both characters in different tone-
 Hurts! He wants to know if it hurts!
Nothing to be done.

12) Which of the following sequence you liked the most:
o   Vladimir – Estragon killing time in questions and conversations while waiting
Vladimir and Estragon: The Had and the Boot 
  Pozzo – Lucky episode in both acts
• Converstion of Vladimir with the boy

I like Vladimir and Estragon between sequence because their each dialogue give depth means.- For example –
VLADIMIR:
(stooping). True. (He buttons his fly.) Never neglect the little things of
life.
ESTRAGON:
What do you expect, you always wait till the last moment.
VLADIMIR:
(musingly). The last moment . . . (He meditates.) Hope deferred maketh
the something sick, who said that?

 13)  Did you feel the effect of existential crisis or meaninglessness of human existence in the irrational and indifference Universe during screening of the movie? Where and when exactly that feeling was felt, if ever it was?

Yes, I feel the effect of existential crisis or meaninglessness of human existence in irrational and indifferent universe during screening of the movie –
ESTRAGON: What?
VLADIMIR: Suppose we repented.
ESTRAGON: Repented what? (Memory & Conscience . . .Memento movie!)
VLADIMIR: Oh . . . (He reflects.) We wouldn't have to go into the details.
ESTRAGON: Our being born?

 14) Vladimir and Estragon talks about ‘hanging’ themselves and commit suicide, but they do not do so. How do you read this idea of suicide in Existentialism

Vladimir and Estragon talks about ‘hanging' themselves and commit suicide, but they do not do so. Because suicide is immediately thing if someone want commit suicide so they try as soon as because if frustrated person own self find one hope then they didn’t able to commit suicide in this play same thing happened –
 ESTRAGON: Let's hang ourselves immediately!
VLADIMIR: From a bough? (They go towards the tree.) I wouldn't trust it.
ESTRAGON:We can always try.
VLADIMIR: Go ahead.
Vladimir has again hope to meet Godot

15) Can we do any political reading of the play if we see European nations represented by the 'names' of the characters (Vladimir - Russia; Estragon - France; Pozzo - Italy and Lucky - England)? What interpretation can be inferred from the play written just after World War II? Which country stands for 'Godot'?

If we can do political reading of the play Characters present this country :- Vladimir – Russia, Estragon -France, Pozzo- Italy, Lucky – England these countries were dominated by Germany ‘s Hitler that why those countries might be waiting for Godot it means Germany country stands for Godot.

16)  So far as Pozzo and Lucky [master and slave] are concerned, we have to remember that Beckett was a disciple of Joyce and that Joyce hated England. Beckett meant Pozzo to be England, and Lucky to be Ireland." (Bert Lahr who played Estragon in Broadway production). Does this reading make any sense? Why? How? What?

Pozzo and Lucky are concerned as master slave relation like England and Ireland because Ireland status like slave even it is separated country even it want to become England slave as like Lucky his master become blind even he is slave of his master. Ireland has reason to become slave of England because may they believe  for good stating to join powerful country.

17)  The more the things change, the more it remains similar. There seems to have no change in Act I and Act II of the play. Even the conversation between Vladimir and the Boy sounds almost similar. But there is one major change. In Act I, in reply to Boy;s question, Vladimir says:
"BOY: What am I to tell Mr. Godot, Sir?
VLADIMIR:
Tell him . . . (he hesitates) . . . tell him you saw us. (Pause.) You did see us, didn't you?
How does this conversation go in Act II? Is there any change in seeming similar situation and conversation? If so, what is it? What does it signify?

Yes, in the Act II Vladimir ask about Godot look and boy answer his question -

VLADIMIR : Did you meet anyone?
BOY: No Sir.
VLADIMIR: Two other . . . (he hesitates) . . . men?
BOY:  I didn't see anyone, Sir.
Silence.
VLADIMIR:  What does he do, Mr. Godot? (Silence.) Do you hear me?

Other Question like his doult may be therefor he ask questions like that- 

VLADIMIR: Fair or . . . (he hesitates) . . . or black?
BOY: I think it's white, Sir.
Silence.
VLADIMIR: Christ have mercy on us!
Silence.
BOY: What am I to tell Mr. Godot, Sir?

That type of questions through Vladimir try to conform really Godot exist after his confirm he felt proud on his self he is not like Estragon but he always waiting for Godot so he has hope Godot mercy him not Estrogen.

Friday, 20 November 2020

Breath: Interpretation challenge and shooting a video.

Welcome Readers! 


          
             Breath by Damien Hirst

           




       Breath in and breath out
The very first sound comes in the play is of breathing. A very long sound of breath may signify the birth as well as at last when sound of breath out is coming, it may symbolizes the death of person.

Breath by Liana De Jourdan




In this one we find fresh fruits, vegetables and pesticides package of fruit juices. The idea of eating natural or hygienic fruits is somehow connected with our feetness. But it symbolizes that these may help in gaining good health but should not help in escaping from death. In this way again it showcases the very much idea of Existentialism.

Modern Interpretation of Breath




It showcases how humans are surrounded by materialistic things from birth to the death as well as whole human life from birth to death was shown in this. Though the voice of breathing is common but the vast difference is that, in the old play there is only a sound of breathing which is moving while in this one picture keeps on moving. In this photographs may symbolize the moments which has been passed away and remain only as memory.

Thank you...😔

Tuesday, 17 November 2020

Virtual Teacher's Day 2020

Welcome Readers! 

Welcome to my blog. This blog is about Teachers day celebration of 2020. As known because of the Corona pandemic , our schools and colleges are in uncertainty. So we came up with a new idea. That to celebrate this teachers day virtually. Whatever circumstances are going on but the important thing is that " show must go on ". We are the students of the Department of English, Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University celebrate this Teachers day virtually ,under the guidance of Dr. Dilip Barad sir( head of the department ).




  

Live streaming Ttal number
Views/blog viewa

On Facebook                          267

on  YouTube                            104

Blog viewers                           80

Quiz responses                       20


As we know that the Corona crisis is going on, online teaching has become very important. So we are trying to make a new path to celebrate Teachers day. Now is the time Teachers have to know how to deal with online teaching platforms. So this celebration was very helpful to us, we got a concept of how to engage students in online teaching. 

Thank you...


Monday, 16 November 2020

Existentialism: Flipped Learning Ask Questions.

Welcome Readers !

Existentialism:
          Existentialism's explanation and according to Kierkegaard. He believes that philosophical thought are same. Triangle with  Individuality, Freedom and passions. Possibility of God and it happens after thinking. Whose attention will be attracted to a subject like suicide, Anguish, Thanks, Absurdity, Passion, Emotions their freedom or even despair.

Existentialism ask question of existence that why I am here? what is life? Divine perspective and human perspective. Human were not design by any supernatural power, existentialism see the life from religiously, scientifically and philosophically and raise question about human existence.

Teacher's role is critical in Flipped learning because a teacher has to design a task which is so engaging, innovative and learner friendly.

FlippedLearning for the Semester 3 Students of English Literature! This is a very modern approach to traditional language teaching. 

Flipped learning is best to learn from anywhere, I like it most because it provides us content with appropriate pictures and signs so it would easy to understand the content. Flipped learning also very beneficial for four basic skill LSRW, through this learning we can improve our listening skill from native speaker and also we can improve our memory to remember the speakers words and note down. And also we can learn how to pronounce spells. At last, I can say that we can learn from anywhere in our time through flipped learning.

Thank you ✍️




Sunday Reading : Ecocricism


Hello, Everyone welcome to my blog !
This was a part of my thinking activity which was given by Dilip sir. Here is the Sir's blog linkhttps://blog.dilipbarad.com/2020/11/session-on-ecocriticism-devang-nanavati.html?m=1


The Theory of Ecocriticism :
If we look for a meaning of Ecocriticism then that means :    


"ecocriticism is the study of the relationship between literature and the physical environment".


The term Ecocriticism is coined by William Rueckert in a 1978 article which called for the formulation of "an ecological poetics".


So in the study of literature we don't study only one thing,but various things that are studying in literature. Like Ecocriticism and Many more. How Nature is represented in literature. What is the relation between ecology and literature? That question is raised in mind. Generally, ecocriticism can be applied to a primary source by either interpreting a text through an ecocritical lens, with an eye towards nature, or examining an ecocritical trope within the text. Ecocriticism is known by a number of other designations, including "green (cultural) studies", "ecopoetics", and "environmental literary criticism".


If we think about Indian literature then we find that in Indian literature nature comes as a character and  plays a vital role. Derrida argues that there is nothing outside of text, but another philosopher Kate soper  "it is not language which has hole in the ozone layer".

Thank you...✍️


Sunday Reading : Ecocriticism

Welcome Readers!

Ecocriticism is the study of literature and environment from an interdisciplinary point of view where all sciences come together to analyze the environment and brainstorm possible solutions for the correction of the contemporary environmental situation. Ecocriticism was officially heralded by the publication of two seminal works, both published in the mid-1990s: The Ecocriticism Reader, edited by Cheryll Glotfelty and Harold Fromm, and The Environmental Imagination, by Lawrence Buell.

Ecocriticism investigates the relation between humans and the natural world in literature. It deals with how environmental issues, cultural issues concerning the environment and attitudes towards nature are presented and analyzed. One of the main goals in ecocriticism is to study how individuals in society behave and react in relation to nature and ecological aspects. This form of criticism has gained a lot of attention during recent years due to higher social emphasis on environmental destruction and increased technology. It is hence a fresh way of analyzing and interpreting literary texts, which brings new dimensions to the field of literary and theoritical studies. Ecocriticism is an intentionally broad approach that is known by a number of other designations, including “green (cultural) studies”, “ecopoetics”, and “environmental literary criticism.”

Earlier theories in literary and cultural studies focussed on issue of class, race, gender, region are criteria and “subjects”of critical analysis. The late twentieth century has woken up to a new threat: ecological disaster. The most important environmental problems that humankind faces as a whole are: nuclear war, depletion of valuable natural resources, population explosion, proliferation of exploitative technologies, conquest of space preliminary to using it as a garbage dump, pollution, extinction of species (though not a human problem) among others. In such a context, literary and cultural theory has begun to address the issue as a part of academic discourse. Numerous green movements have sprung up all over the world, and some have even gained representations in the governments.

Various versions of environmentalism developed.Deep ecology and ecofeminism were two important developments. These new ideas questioned the notion of “development” and “modernity,” and argued that all Western notions in science, philosophy, politics were “anthropocentric” (human-centred) and “androcentric”(Man/male-centred). Technology, medical science with its animal testing, the cosmetic and fashion industry all came in for scrutiny from environmentalists. Deep ecology, for instance, stressed on a “biocentric” view (as seen in the name of the environmentalist group, “Earth First!!”).

Sunday, 15 November 2020

Films Review: Midnight's Chldren's and The Reluctant Fundamentalist , The Black prince .


Welcome Readers !

Here I am going to share my review upon 
movies, which task was given by Dilipsir ,so here it's likehttps://blog.dilipbarad.com/2015/09/postcolonial-studies-film-screening.html?m=1


Midnight's children


Midnight's children,  is a novel written by British-Indian Novelist Salman Rushdie and filmed by Deepa Mehta. The film was very popular in foreign countries and well criticized in India also. The film didn't cover up all the things written deeply in the novel due to time period of the movie so it's looks like the collage of many things like history, culture, Colonialism. freedom movement, etc.

The story of the film begun with the year of 1917, the birth year of Indira Gandhi and end with the emergency or we can say that the last stage of Indira Gandhi's Life. So, some may have question that why the protagonist of the film narrated the the history before the thirty years when he was not in her mother's womb? Well, I don't know why Rushdie connected Indira Gandhi's era throughout the film, we must read the novel to understand the connection. The story about the Children who were born in the stroke of the midnight 15th august 1947 with the magical power, in which two major character like Saleem Sinai, the protagonist belong to reach family while the Shiva who was born in poor family later joined the Army and fought in the battle with Pakistan to free Bangladesh. The main idea of hybridity in culture and identity we can see in the movie, as per the quote 'Let reach to be poor and poor to be reach' Saleem, actually, the son of British man William Methwold and poor Marathian lady and the Shiva was the son of Ahemad Sinai and Amina, but, Mary, a nurse in the hospital changed these both baby boy with each other because her lover was a Marxist and pursued mary to protest against elite class. Furthemore, Saleem went to pakistan and Shiva Joined Indian Army, so here we can see the partition of India and pakistan. later on, After the war, Saleem came to India, his mother land and marry with Parvati, beloved of Shiva and she gave birth to baby boy who was the son of shiva so, we again see the hybridity. And also we can see the culture of India like snake Charmer. SO, this way movie ended through various perspectives.

Here, also the good use of background music which symbolize many thing, the nose of Ghani family also a symbol. The narrative techniques also used in very good way to understand the story. And also a camera focus was excellent, while the Tajmahal scene came that time camera focused more on the poor conditioned house rather than Tajmahal. So, here film tried to show the real India through camera technique.


Postcolonial point of view:
Hybridity:
Miscegenation:
Postcolonial Feminism:

  • Hybridity: Hybridity means Something that is formed by combining two or more things. Here, in the movie we can see the hybridity in the identity, Saleem is the perfect example of hybrid man, who was the son of colonizer and poor Indian lady and also the other character, Shiva was another example of hybrid man who was the son of Muslim parents. If we see the hybridity in culture then we can give the example of west(Methwold) and east(Poor Indian lady) and also Sikh(Picturesingh) with Hindu(Parvati)culture mixed each other.



Miscegenation: As per the definition of Merriam Webster dictionary, Miscegenation means a mixture of races; especially: marriage, cohabitation, or sexual intercourse between a white person and a member of another race. In the movie we can find the sexual relation between White colonizer Methwold with black skin Indian Poor lady and another sexual relationship with white Saleem with black skinned Parvati. So, in this way postcolonialist studies the mixture of identity and culture.



  • Postcolonial Feminism:  Postcolonial theorist also studies the culture and literature with the feminist perspective. In the beginning of the movie Doctor did not allow to examine Naseem's illness to see her body, there a curtain between doctor and Naseem and her father said that " You Europe returned chappies forget certain things. Doctor sahib, my daughter is a decent girl, it goes without saying. She does not flaunt her body under the noses of strange men. You will never understand that you can not be permitted to see her, no, no, not in any circumstances; accordingly. I have required her to be positioned behind that sheet. She stands there, like a good girl(Rushdie 2011)."
Another examples is when Mumtaz, Saleem's mother got married with Ahemad Sinai, that time Ahemad gave her new name Amina. So, we can see the power of patriarchy in the movie and also a exploitation of poor Indian lady by Britisher Methwold.


Magic Realism: Magic realism also a part of postcolonial studies. Magic Realism is a narrative style which is add beauty to the historical representation in the movie otherwise it is boring to watch. The Midnight's Children were not ordinary kids but they have power, like, Saleem has power of sense of smell to feeling the different things and people whereas Parvati also has power like Abrakadabra to hide people or things in the basket.

So, in this way we can see the movie with the various approaches like magic realism, Miscegenation, Hybridity in identity and in culture and also see with the postcolonial perspective.

* The Reluctan Fundamentalist:


The Reluctant Fundamentalist a novel written by Pakistani Writer Mohsin Hamid and then adopted in film directed by Mira Nair in 2014. The story is about the young man Changez Khan who attracted to American Business culture. He was an intellectual and respected person in American wall street business company. 



The Story Begun with the interview of American CIA  agent Bobby Lincoln for the abduction of American Professor in Pakistan. Bob was Taking interview of Changez Khan in the Coffee cafe in Lahor that he may be involved in this abduction or in the matter of 9/11. Here Mira Nair interestingly used the flashback technique which was move us from Pakistan to America in eye opening way. The title of the movie give us two different views one is that fundamentalist in terrorism and other business fundamentalist.



The film started with the interview of Changez Khan By Bobby in which Changez Khan narrated his story about the his life in America. The hero of the novel was very young, intellectual, businessman and highly reputed. There he was living a good life with his beloved Erica, a very good artist in photography. But suddenly all the things changed  with Changez after the attack on WTC tower. All people look towards him like he is terrorist, he insulted by FBI and many American fellows and abused him. Once, he loved America like his native land but after abusing and insulted her sincerity he came back to Pakistan as University professor.

Furthermore, Bobby blamed that he is teaching terrorism in the university and has connection with Fazil a Muslim activist and Mujahid but that was not truth, without any kind of proof Bobby blamed him therefore his hatred towards America was increased but he don't believe in any kind of avenge. He lost his innocent fellow by the fire of American Agent then CIA agents realized that they made mistake and killed innocent man. But at the end of the movie Changez wants to freedom from Mujahid and America's business culture and he wants to love peaceful life.


The movie also used very good narrative technique like flashback technique to make movie very interesting, and also used very good camera focus when we see the scene of attack on WTC tower when camera on the face of Changez rather on live telecast, to know the expression of Changez towards it. Also a very good meaningful background musics are there to convey the nonverbal ideas like, In the kidnapping of the white professor Rainier there was a loud Sufi Music, and in the meeting of Changez and Erica, where Changez tries to convince Erica to forget everything, the lyrics of background songs matches very well, "I want you to be..". When Changez was upset with the way he was treated in America and When he came back he had an arguments with his parents, and the background songs was "You say things to burn the heart, yet I must Smile." So, we can say that it is very intellectual movie thoroughly. 

  • Postcolonial Point of view: If we see this movie with the perspectives of the postcolonial studies so we have to apply Edward said's 'Orientalism' and also apply the race theory. We can say that why western countries and especially America looking towards Muslim countries as countries of terrorism? It is all about the illusion of america that every Muslim are terrorist. America Know that if we want be in power position so that we have to destroyed all Muslim countries in the name of terrorism. One may have question like Muslim countries are more in the number then other religion, then why they don't take action on America. But, actually, because of obsequiousness of Pakistan and Saudi Arab others countries unable to convince that all Muslims are not like that.
In the movie also Changez faced problem because he belong to Muslim country. All countries and their movies show the villains almost are Muslim. They succeeded to built this kind of stereotype in the mind of other religion's people. America only see their 3000 Americans died in this attack but they do not see that they killed billions of Muslims in Gulf war and in Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria wars. If world want to make peace in the earth then all have to protest against America to stop terrorism because "America is the mother of terrorism.

The black prince:

The Black Prince is a 2017 international historical drama film directed by Kavi Raz and featuring the acting debut of Satinder Sartaaj. It tells the story of Duleep Singh, the last Maharajah of the Sikh Empire and the Punjab area, and his relationship with Queen Victoria.

Thank you...✍️


             




Saturday, 14 November 2020

Paper no 11 Assignment Term :- Post Colonialism and post modernism.

Paper no 11 Assignment Term :- Post Colonialism and post modernism.

Name :- Hansa G. Bhaliy

Roll no :- 30
Sem :- 03
Batch :- 2019 - 21
Enrollment no :-  2069108420190004
Email Id :- hansabhaliya20@gmail.com
Paper no :- 11 Postcolonial literature
Topic :- Term - Postcolonialiasm
                        - Post modernism
So,here first I would like to talk about Post colonialism .


• What is Postcolonialiasm ?
Defination :- By definition, postcolonialism is a period of time after colonialism, and postcolonial literature is typically characterized by its opposition to the colonial. ... Many critics now propose that the term should be expanded to include the literatures of Canada, the United States, and Australia.
In many works of literature, specifically those coming out of Africa, the Middle East, and the Indian subcontinent, we meet characters who are struggling with their identities in the wake of colonization, or the establishment of colonies in another nation. For example, the British had a colonial presence in India from the 1700s until India gained its independence in 1947. As you can imagine, the people of India, as well as the characters in Indian novels, must deal with the economic, political, and emotional effects that the British brought and left behind. This is true for literature that comes out of any colonized nation. In many cases, the literature stemming from these events is both emotional and political.
Postcolonialism or postcolonial studies is the academic study of the cultural legacy of colonialism and imperialism, focusing on the human consequences of the control and exploitation of colonized people and their lands. Post colonialism is a critical theory analysis of the history, culture, literature, and discourse of European imperial power. The namepostcolonialism is modeled on postmodernism, with which it shares certain concepts and methods, and may be thought of as a reaction to or departure from colonialism in the same way postmodernism is a reaction to modernism. The ambiguous term colonialism may refer either to a system of government or to an ideology or world view underlying that system—in general postcolonialism represents an ideological response to colonialist thought, rather than simply describing a system that comes after colonialism. The term postcolonial studies may be preferred for this reason. Postcolonialism encompasses a wide variety of approaches, and theoreticians may not always agree on a common set of definitions. On a simple level, it may seek through anthropological study to build a better understanding of colonial life from the point of view of the colonized people, based on the assumption that the colonial rulers are unreliablenarrators.


Postcolonialism includes a vast array of writers and subjects. In fact, the very different geographical, historical, social, religious, and economic concerns of the different ex-colonies dictate a wide variety in the nature and subject of most postcolonial writing. Wisker has noted in her book that it is even simplistic to theorize that all postcolonial writing is resistance writing. In fact, many postcolonial writers themselves will argue that their countries are still very much colonial countries, both in terms of their values and behaviors, and that these issues are reflected in their work. In her essay on postcolonialism, Deepika Bahri agrees, noting that while the definition of postcolonialism may be fairly boundaried, the actual use of the term is very subjective, allowing for a yoking together of a very diverse range of experiences, cultures, and problems. This diversity of definitions exists,...


• What is post modernism?

•Postmodernism is a movement that focuses on the reality of the individual, denies statements that claim to be true for all people and is often expressed in a pared-down style in arts, literature and culture.

As per dictionary meaning,a late 20th-century style and concept in the arts, architecture, and criticism, which represents a departure from modernism and is characterized by the self-conscious use of earlier styles and conventions, a mixing of different artistic styles and media, and a general distrust of theories.Postmodernism is a broad movement that developed in the mid- to late 20th century across philosophy, the arts, architecture, and criticism, marking a departure from modernism. The term has been more generally applied to the historical era following modernity and the tendencies of this era.

•Postmodernism, also spelled post-modernism, in Western philosophy, a late 20th-century movement characterized by broad skepticism, subjectivism, or relativism; a general suspicion of reason; and an acute sensitivity to the role of ideology in asserting and maintaining political and economic power.A general and wide-ranging term which is applied to literature, art, philosophy, architecture, fiction, and cultural and literary criticism, among others. Postmodernism is largely a reaction to the assumed certainty of scientific, or objective, efforts to explain reality. In essence, it stems from a recognition that reality is not simply mirrored in human understanding of it, but rather, is constructed as the mind tries to understand its own particular and personal reality. For this reason, postmodernism is highly skeptical of explanations which claim to be valid for all groups, cultures, traditions, or races, and instead focuses on the relative truths of each person. In the postmodern understanding, interpretation is everything; reality only comes into being through our interpretations of what the world means to us individually. Postmodernism relies on concrete experience over abstract principles, knowing always that the outcome of one's own experience will necessarily be fallible and relative, rather than certain and universal.

These both teams are inextricably inter-woven considering their radicle platform where Literary writers,critics,theorists,followers,etc.put their chaallenges rather than to facing it. These terms do not find any solution but raise the questions and challenges in lieu of answering the questions. Literature during British rule on India, literature after independence of India and the literature written from four corners of the world protesting against oppressors' hands, especially in their writing are the gush in literature in general sense of the term . In the case of India, Pakistan,South Africa and other Third World countries after Second World War, whatever Literature written by these country writers was taken into consideration as a new literature by Ex- Colonies like Ireland ,Canada and Australia,too. To be very conspicuous in explaining about the literature was written by those who were at the centre means those who politically and economically powerful over powerless and now literature written by those who are on the periphery and powerless over the so - called powerful.
• Colonial and imperial rules were legitimatized by anthropological theories which increasingly portrayed the people of the colonized world as inferior, child-like,or feminine, incapable of looking after themselves and requiring the paternal rule of the west for their own best interests. About India,Britishers or sahibs came for their interests and benefits,so colonized the place.Colonies came into existence.Idea of Racism and colour - discrimination got the momentum. Class consciousness spread throughout the country.Cultural imperialism thirsted upon Colonized. Psychological programing of the laymen was common and as usual. Colonial power remains changed and challenged if the balance of power is slowly limited. The beginning of 19th century came with the concept of Ex- Imperialism of Western countries. Not only biological but also mental existence was incarcerated. It was colonial period that was the challenge of its next.

Post-  colonialism,after colonialism,came in the form of absolute protest to it. Inclusion and exclusion was minutely observed when post - Colonial Age established. Robert Young also expresses his idea in following remark,

      " If you are someone who does not identify yourself as western country,or someone who is part of culture and yet excluded by its dominant voice,inside yet outside, outside, then Post-Colonialism offers you a way of seeing things
        differently.

• These western countries like America, England,France ,Spain , Germany,etc.had ruled before 1950s but then Post-colonial Countries like Africa,India ,Iran ,etc. In general ,Middle Eastern countries have the turn to be unruled and confronted the imposed system of Imperialism. Country like Britain had special cultural and traditional prototypical thoughts of Africa and Hindustan. Now the colonial countries are in return as a reciprocal ,concentrating and observing teh westren countries and challenging their archetypal images of themselves. So the former British Empire is a particular focus. So whatever ruled and occupied by Britishers in new re- empowered and to be enjoyed as Swaraj.

•Such a Post colonial combat against colonial countries came into consideration to experience the  British Raj and its political domination. Such a post colonial literature also so known as new literature or commonwealth literature was once under the dependency of European literature. Therefore, what they showed in the literature and it  give rise to Anti colonial literature. If any reader mentions about those revolutionaries who objected the imperial power then can it be called Anti - Colonialists ? Marx was also  strongly against the inequality among the king and slave struggle then though he was 19th century revolutionary socialist and theorist, can hi called the anti colonialist of the 21th world of literature. For such challenging task, serious debate is needed. His ideology about the socialization and equal distribution of the income of the country among the three classes is a quite new backbone in the discussion of Anti colonialism. The postcolonial critics like Edward said, Homi Bhabha, Frantz Fanon, Gayatri Chakravorty spivak, V.S. Naipaul, Salman Rushdie, Michel foucault, Derrida,etc. Have bestowed the best culmination in the field of the anti colonialism and literature. In the process of postcolonial observation and analysis the  particular words like'Dalit', 'inferior', 'lower', 'second class', 'third world', 'peripheral', 'aarna going to be redefined reconstructed with its new form namely 'subaltern'. It is now belonging to the the specific intention or period of time but going from the process of generalisation from where it was particularised. And now the idea of postcolonialism came into to being that does not belong to the peculiar age but the  universal movement. If the person goes in, becomes a post colonialist. In general sense of the term if someone is given injustice and he raises his voice against the existing evil like phenomenon he is post colonialist that is what Robert Young has in his account, whether they are feminists, Dalitists , Subaltern's voice , Marxists or Fanonists.


              
                                  



short

 This is a

Friday, 13 November 2020

Mooc - Modernism / postmodernism

Welcome Readers!

Modernism and postmodernism are well-known concepts characterizing the period from 1789 to the present. Modernism in general includes the ideas behind empirical sciences, anti-idealistic philosophy, liberal democracy, secularism and belief in reason that has emerged since the Enlightenment. Conventionally, modernism and postmodernism are separated into scientific and artistic enterprises.

This course focuses on the cognitive links between what Foucault called the “human sciences” and aesthetic modernism in the arts including literary criticism. In the dynamic culture of modernism a move towards greater subjectivity was a common feature, however in the human sciences it was modified by a devotion to rationality and scientific progress. In its first phase postmodernism opposed modernism and regarded self and culture as linguistic constructs. Currently a move towards universalism, tradition and religion is articulated among thinkers such as Giorgio Agamben and Slavoj i ek.

The course views modernism and postmodernism primarily as modes of thinking that affirm the power of human beings to create, improve and remake their environment with the aid of scientific knowledge, technology and art and thus reshape the world. These modes of thinking and the ideas that constitute them are presented in a historical context.





Revision Assignment: Deconstructive Reading of sonnet 18


Welcome Readers!
Deconstructionism is a technique of literary criticism which seeks to analyze a work as thoroughly as possible as it pertains to other works.

"there is nothing outside the text"

Every written source is in itself a linked text; Derrida believed that there was no objectivity possible. The main aim is to understand why the work was created, by examining the "context" of its creation: history, era, culture, society, and other similar works.

How to Deconstruct the poem:-


To analyze a poem using deconstruction, the first step should be to place down the superficial meaning; 


  • What do the words say? 

  • How does the poem speak to you?


Most examinations of poetry focus on the surface meaning without digging deeper. You should try to find out where and why the poem was written, and for what purpose: was it a response to cultural norms, or a reflection of self-examination? Who was the writer, and why was this poem, at this time, so important?

Historical Context 


The historical context is also important. Many poems directly reflect public sentiment of the time, while others deliberately go against the popular sentiment. Use your knowledge of the writer and his/her lifestyle to understand how the poem reflects the times.





Plague- Epidemic Literature


Welcome Readers!

The Plague (French: La Peste) is a novel by Albert camus, published in 1947, that tells the story of a plague sweeping the French Algerian city of oran. It asks a number of questions relating to the nature of destiny and the human condition. The characters in the book, ranging from doctors to vacationers to fugitives, all help to show the effects the plague has on a populace.


Jill Lepore writes about the literature of epidemics, looking back at great works about plagues by Daniel Defoe, Mary Shelley, Edgar Allan Poe, Jack London, Stephen King, Albert Camus, and Jose Saramago. What all plague literature shares is, first, the knowledge that the plague threatens the human world, that is “cuts away the higher realms, the loftiest capacities of humanity, and leaves only the animal.” And second, plague literature offers books themselves as the antidote to dehumanization: “the existence of books, no matter how grim the tale, is itself a sign, evidence that humanity endures, in the very contagion of reading.” 

The literature of contagion is vile. A plague is like a lobotomy. It cuts away the higher realms, the loftiest capacities of humanity, and leaves only the animal. “Farewell to the giant powers of man,” Mary Shelley wrote in “The Last Man,” in 1826, after a disease has ravaged the world. “Farewell to the arts,—to eloquence.” Every story of epidemic is a story of illiteracy, language made powerless, man made brute.

But, then, the existence of books, no matter how grim the tale, is itself a sign, evidence that humanity endures, in the very contagion of reading. Reading may be an infection, the mind of the writer seeping, unstoppable, into the mind of the reader. And yet it is also—in its bidden intimacy, an intimacy in all other ways banned in times of plague—an antidote, proven, unfailing, and exquisite. …

“This is all we are good for, listening to someone reading us the story of a human mankind that existed before us.” And that, in the modern plague novel, is the final terror of every world-ending plague, the loss of knowledge, for which reading itself is the only cure. 

Assignment of Character analysis of" To The Lighthouse"

Assignment of character analysis of " To The Lighthouse"

Hansa : Hansa Bhaliya
Sem :- 3
Roll No  :- 30
Email Id:- hansabhaliya20@gmail.com
Paper Name :- 9, The Modernist Literature
About Virginia Woolf :-


Born into a privileged English household in 1882, author Virginia Woolf was raised by free-thinking parents. She began writing as a young girl and published her first novel, The Voyage Out, in 1915. She wrote modernist classics including Mrs. Dalloway, To the Lighthouse and Orlando, as well as pioneering feminist works, A Room of One's Own and Three Guineas. In her personal life, she suffered bouts of deep depression. She committed suicide in 1941, at the age of 59.
From the time of her birth until 1895, Woolf spent her summers in St. Ives, a beach town at the very southwestern tip of England. The Stephens’ summer home, Talland House, which is still standing today, looks out at the dramatic Porthminster Bay and has a view of the Godrevy Lighthouse, which inspired her writing. In her later memoirs, Woolf recalled St. Ives with a great fondness. In fact, she incorporated scenes from those early summers into her modernist novel To the Lighthouse (1927).
Literary Work:-
            Several years before marrying Leonad, Virginia had begun working on her first novel. The original title is Melymbrosia. After nine years and innumerable drafts, it was released in 1915 as The Voyage Out. Woolf used the book to experiment with several literary tools including compelling and unusual narrative perspectives, dream-states and free association prose. Two years later, the Woolf’s bought a used printing press and established Hogarth Press, their own publishing house operated out of their home Hogarth House. Virginia and Leonard published some of their writing, as well as the work of Sigmund Freud, Katharine Mansfield and T.S. Eliot. 
         A year after the end of World War I, the Woolf’s purchased Monks House, a cottage in the village of Romello in 1919, and that same year Virginia published Night and Day, a novel set in Edwardian England. Her third novel Jacob's Room was published by Hogarth in 1922. Based on her brother Thoby, it is considered a significant departure from her earlier novels with its modernist elements. That year, she met author, poet and landscape gardener Vita Sackville-West, the wife of English diplomat Harold Nicolson. Virginia and Vita began a friendship that developed into a romantic affair. Although their affair eventually ended, they remained friends until Virginia Woolf's death.
           In 1925, Woolf received rave reviews for Mrs. Dalloway her fourth novel. The mesmerizing story interweaved interior monologues and raised issues of feminism, mental illness and homosexuality in post-World War I England. Mrs. Dalloway was adapted into a 1997 film, starring Vanessa Redgrave, and inspired The Hours, a 1998 novel by Michael Cunningham and a 2002 film adaptation. Her 1928 novel, To the Lighthouse, was another critical success and considered revolutionary for its stream of consciousness storytelling. The modernist classic examines the subtext of human relationships through the lives of the Ramsay family as they vacation on the Isle of Skye in Scotland. 
          Woolf found a literary muse in Sackville-West, the inspiration for Woolf's 1928 novel Orlando, which follows an English nobleman who mysteriously becomes a woman at the age of 30 and lives on for over three centuries of English history. The novel was a breakthrough for Woolf who received critical praise for the groundbreaking work, as well as a newfound level of popularity.
          In 1929, Woolf published A Room of One's Own, a feminist essay based on lectures she had given at women's colleges, in which she examines women's role in literature. In the work, she sets forth the idea that “A woman must have money and a room of her own if she is to write fiction.” Woolf pushed narrative boundaries in her next work, The Waves (1931), which she described as "a play-poem" written in the voices of six different characters. Woolf published The Years, the final novel published in her lifetime in 1937, about a family's history over the course of a generation. The following year she published Three Guineas, an essay which continued the feminist themes of A Room of One's Own and addressed fascism and war.
           Throughout her career, Woolf spoke regularly at colleges and universities, penned dramatic letters, wrote moving essays and self-published a long list of short stories. By her mid-forties, she had established herself as an intellectual, an innovative and influential writer and pioneering feminist. Her ability to balance dream-like scenes with deeply tense plot lines earned her incredible respect from peers and the public alike. Despite her outward success, she continued to regularly suffer from debilitating bouts of depression and dramatic mood swings.
Suicide and Legacy:-
               Woolf's husband, Leonard, always by her side, was quite aware of any signs that pointed to his wife’s descent into depression. He saw, as she was working on what would be her final manuscript, Between the Acts (published posthumously in 1941),that she was sinking into deepening despair. At the time, World War II was raging on and the couple decided if England was invaded by Germany, they would commit suicide together, fearing that Leonard, who was Jewish, would be in particular danger. In 1940, the couple’s London home was destroyed during the Blitz, the Germans bombing of the city. 


About novel “ To The Lighthouse :-
                  This book is without a plot. What story there is can be summarized quickly: Mr. Ramsay is a philosopher and his wife is a famous beauty, both in middle age, are staying with their eight children and various guests at their summer holiday home in the Hebrides, islands off Scotland. Conflicts arise and fall in Part One, especially between Mr. and Mrs. Ramsay, but also within individual characters’ minds. We see the shifting flow of thought and relationships from various points of view. The day culminates in a dinner in which union is triumphantly achieved, at least for a moment. In Part Two, things fall apart; time ravages the house, and we learn in passing that Mrs. Ramsay has shockingly died. Moreover, a daughter, Prue, has died in childbirth, and a son, Andrew, has been killed in First World War. Blackness and chaos lift at last as the housekeepers get to work on the dilapidated house and discuss the family’s coming return. Part Three is a revisiting of Part One; now Mr. Ramsay is back at the holiday house with some of the remaining children and original guests, including the artist Lily Briscoe. Mrs. Ramsay’s absence is enormous, as is the question of how to find union again, and the living characters struggle with both. In the end, a tenuous connection is made once more between the characters, and between past and present.

Major characters of the novel :-
1.   Mr. Ramsay
2.   Mrs. Ramsay
3.   Lily Briscoe
4.   James
5.   Cam
6.   Paul Rayley
7.   Minta Doyle

Charater Analysis “To The Lighthouse” :-

Mrs. Ramsay
          The wife of Mr. Ramsay and mother of eight, Mrs. Ramsay is an advocate for marriage and family. She is deeply involved with her roles as wife, mother, hostess, benefactor and muse. She supports the domestic and emotional needs of her husband, children, and guests and is particularly sensitive to her husband's continuing demands for reassurance and love. Mrs. Ramsay encourages women to fulfill society's traditional gender roles and believes marriage and family are necessary for fulfillment. Her unexpected death forces her family and friends to navigate the world without her, but she leaves a lasting influence on all.

Mr. Ramsay
              Mrs. Ramsay's husband and father of eight, Mr. Ramsay published a significant book in his field at 25. After his early success, he has failed to gain more recognition. His lack of professional success has helped make him insufferably needy, irritable, and ill-tempered—traits he demonstrates by slamming doors, throwing plates, and other attention-grabbing, childish behavior. He constantly seeks praise and attention, especially from women: at 61 to ease the pain of his failures and at 71 to soothe the pain of heartbreak.

Lily Briscoe :-
              Free-spirited Lily Briscoe is intense, thinking she is in love with the Ramsays, the island, the house, and perhaps Paul Rayley. Despite her independence and unwillingness to follow a traditional life, Lily is insecure about her work and her choices. She grows impatient with Charles Tansley, who insists women cannot be artists, and is envious of beautiful and see humingly serene Mrs. Ramsay, who appears to get everything she wants. Years later after Mrs. Ramsay's death, Lily returns to Scotland to confront her loss and paint her picture again, this time finishing it.

James
             James Ramsay plays a key role in the novel because he is the character that wants to sail to the lighthouse as the novel begins. Always seeking to protect her children from disappointment, Mrs. Ramsay tries to preserve his sweet innocence by shielding him from his father's gruff, but accurate, comments about bad weather that will prevent the excursion. James carries a long and serious grudge toward his father, initially for stealing his mother's attention and later for not demonstrating love as his mother had.

Cam
              Cam is rebellious, refusing to listen to her nursemaid and mother. Like Lily Briscoe, she is independent, but her youth prevents her independence from taking real form. Because of a later pact with James to withstand their father's dominance, her neutrality causes conflict between the siblings as she relents in her resolve against their father, seeing him at his most charming. She shares in and understands James's pleasure when Mr. Ramsay finally compliments him for his sailing.

Paul Rayley
                 At Mrs. Ramsay's encouragement, simple and handsome Paul Rayley proposes to Minta Doyle, with whom he has been spending a lot of time. To Mrs. Ramsay's satisfaction, Paul is a refreshing alternative to academics, whom she finds boring. When Lily, who thinks she loves Paul, asks to accompany him to look for Minta's brooch, he laughs at her, hurting Lily's feelings.

Minta Doyle
                 A charismatic tomboy, Minta Doyle evokes Mrs. Ramsay's jealous feelings because of her youth, beauty, and Mr. Ramsay's attention. Fearless, Minta rushes into things with no thought of the consequences: wearing a precious heirloom to the beach, accepting Paul Rayley's proposal. These rash actions cause her pain (she cries over the brooch) and threaten the harmony of others (she is late to dinner and makes others late because they search for her brooch).